@adam @dave

I just wanted to clear up a misunderstanding. I never meant to imply CurioCaster was or would take 20%. It's always been 3% for CC and 1% for the PI, which is what I always thought the intention for the apps was from over a year ago. The 3% was to make sure the app developers got paid. I added another 1%, because I think LNPay should get paid for providing wallets.

When I mentioned 20%, I never had CC in mind. I was strictly thinking about NATube in that scenario.

@adam @dave

The whole point of that thread for me was

1) How should fees be handled, off the top or added on?
2) I think an app like NATube, which is providing a unique and expensive service would be justified in wanting a 20% fee.

@adam @dave

I don't want you to think I was ever thinking CC should be getting 20%. I've been very happy with 3%, and have always thought it to be fair.

Follow

@adam @dave

Finally, I'm working on the UI/UX to let the listener decide the percentage of each transaction that goes to the app, letting CCs fees truly be v4v. I'm trusting that v4v will be the best course, but if I'm completely honest, it can be daunting to trust that v4v works when it really does seem like it's 5-10% of the users that actually provide treasure, but then someone like @petar comes along with a 5,000,000 sat boost and make it seem like it all may just work out.

· · Web · 1 · 1 · 2

@StevenB @dave @petar This not well understood, but yes, when the v4v turbine is spinning, this happens with surprising regularity. No Agenda got a $10k donation in one shot last year. But believe me, the "donation segment", or some version of it is critical.

LIT shows are clearly a great v4v driver as well.

@adam @StevenB @petar Some form of adapted UI type substitution for a donation segment would be a good brainstorm.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
PodcastIndex Social

Intended for all stake holders of podcasting who are interested in improving the eco system